SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1918

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
YEAP LILY – Appellant
Versus
CHONG CHEE MING – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Cheah Poh Gek ,Respondent Advocate: Eugene Khoo Yean Shern

Table of Content
1. petitioner's application for document discovery. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. guiding principles for discovery applications. (Para 6)
3. company documents and their relevance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. alternative avenues for income assessment. (Para 15 , 16)
5. partnership documents and accessibility. (Para 17 , 18)
6. vagueness of credit card statement request. (Para 20 , 21)
7. relevance of property sale documentation. (Para 22 , 23)
8. joint bank account statements and access. (Para 25 , 26)
9. importance of pay-slips in discovery. (Para 29 , 30)
10. epf statements as matrimonial assets. (Para 32 , 33)
Evrol Mariette Peters J:

Introduction

[1] This is the Petitioner wife's application in encl 38, for discovery of several documents in List A (attached to the Petitioner's affidavit in support), pertaining to the Respondent husband's income and assets. The application was filed pursuant to O 24, rr 3 and 7 of the Rules of Court 2012 ("Rules of Court"), which read:

Order 24 - Discovery and inspection of documents

Rule 3 - Order for discovery

(1) Subject to the provisions of this rule and of rr 4 and 8, the Court may at any time order any party to a cause or mat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top