SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 2170

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ULAGANATHAN MUTHIAH – Appellant
Versus
PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:G T Vanan ,Respondent Advocate: Wong Hok Mun,P S Koh

JUDGMENT

Ong Chee Kwan JC:

[1] This action has to do with the principle of uberrimae fide in a contract of insurance. The principle is trite. The duty has been described by the Court of Appeal in Leong Kum Whay v. QBE Insurance (M) Sdn Bhd & Ors, 2005 MarsdenLR 2071 as follows:

'It is settled beyond dispute that a contract of insurance is one that imposes mutual duty on the parties to it to act uberrimae fides towards each other. On the part of the insured, he or she must make full and frank disclosure of all material facts. It is not for him or her to decide in his or her own mind what is material... The duty is on the insured to make full disclosure of material facts within his knowledge.'

[2] The duty of disclosure has been codified in Malaysia in the Financial Services Act , 2013 (" FSA ") which lays down the duty of disclosure for all insurance contracts. More specifically, s 129 of the , which came into operation since 1 January 2015, provides that:

"Schedule 9 sets out the pre-contractual duty of disclosure and representations for contracts of insurance in Part 2, and the remedies for misrepresentations relating to contracts of insurance in Part 3".

[3]Schedule 9 of the FSA p


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top