HIGH COURT MALAYA ALOR SETAR
MERAPOH RESOURCES CORPORATION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LIM AH TOO @ LIM HAN BOON & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendants' application to strike out the plaintiff's writ. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. dispute origins and plaintiff's claims regarding illegal judgment. (Para 5 , 9 , 12 , 14 , 18) |
| 3. court’s reasoning for considering plaintiff's action abusive. (Para 15 , 36) |
Introduction
[1] The defendants filed an application pursuant to O 18 r 19 RoC seeking an order to strike out the plaintiff's writ (hereinafter referred to as 'encl 32').
[2] The plaintiff filed an application pursuant to O 14 r 1 of the Rules of Courts 2012 (RoC) seeking an order to enter summary judgment against the defendants (hereinafter referred to as 'encl 36').
[3] On 11 May 2015, the parties' counsels presented their oral and written submissions before me. On 25 February 2016, I pronounced my decisions. The delay in delivering my decision will be explained in my judgment. In my decisions, I allowed the defendant's striking out application - encl 32; and, consequently, encl 36 was dismissed.
[4] The plaintiff was not satisfied with my decisions and filed a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeal on 23 March 2016. The reasons for my decisions are set out as below.
Background Facts
The 2013 Suit
[5] T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.