SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 869

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
ONG KENG HUAT – Appellant
Versus
FORTUNE FRONTIER (M) SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application for leave under companies act 1965 for derivative action considered. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. plaintiffs contended that their rights were violated due to unauthorized tenancy actions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 17)
3. foundational legal principles regarding derivative actions established from prior case law. (Para 27 , 28 , 32)
4. legal threshold for good faith and best interest delineated for derivative actions. (Para 62 , 66)
5. judgment concludes with grant of leave to initiate derivative action for the company. (Para 82)
Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali JC:

Introduction

[1] This case concerns an application by the Plaintiff by way of an originating summons dated 21 January 2015, for leave under Companies Act 1965 , s 181A of the , to bring a statutory derivative action on behalf of Fortune Frontier (M) Sdn Bhd, being the first defendant company, against China State Construction Engineering (M) Sdn Bhd ("China State Construction") and one Tan Wei Rong.

[2] I heard the application on 28 May 2015 and gave my decision to grant leave on 25 June 2015. This is my judgment, setting out the full reasons for my decision on the application which involves a number of important poi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top