Table of Content
1. validity of jurisdiction and applicability of law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. facts regarding the development and ownership of a teaching method. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. plaintiff's relationship and development of the brainbuilder business. (Para 7)

[1] This case concerns "Dr Fong's Method" of teaching mathematics to students in primary and secondary schools (Dr Fong's Method) which has been developed by Dr Fong Ho Kheong (Dr Fong), a Singaporean citizen.

[2] Dr Fong incorporated the plaintiff company (Plaintiff) in Singapore. The Plaintiff has entered into a Master License Agreement dated 18 December 2013 [MLA (2013)] with the first defendant company (1st Defendant). The MLA (2013) allows the 1st Defendant to, among others, operate and manage the "BrainBuildef' business (a business to teach mathematics to students) (BrainBuilder Business) in Malaysia.

[3] The following issues arise in this case:

(1) in view of cl 37 MLA (2013) (Clause 37)-

(a) does Malaysian court have jurisdiction to hear this case? In this regard, have the Plaintiff and all the defendants (Defendants) in this matter submitted to the jurisdiction of Malaysian court?; and

(b) if this court has jurisdiction to hear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document