SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 856

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TAN POH LEE – Appellant
Versus
TAN KIM CHOO HOLDINGS SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Michael Chow,Sunita Sankey,Wendy Yeong ,Respondent Advocate: Pavendeep Singh

[1] This is an application by the 2nd Respondent for a validation order pursuant to s 223 of the Companies Act 1965 to validate the payment of a sum of RM4,798,200.00 in the 1st Respondent's current account with Public Bank Berhad ("PBB") towards the overdraft granted by United Overseas Bank (M) Bhd ("UOB") to the 1st Respondent. I have dismissed the validation application. These are the reasons for my decision.

Salient Background Facts

[2] The Petitioner, a contributory and contingent creditor and director of the 1st Respondent has filed the winding up petition to wind up the 1st Respondent on the just and equitable ground.

[3] The Petitioner (Tan Poh Lee), the Supporting Contributories (Tan Poh Hui and Tan Poh Yee) and the 2nd Respondent (Tan Boon Thien) are the children of the Contributory, Tan Kim Choo @ Tan Kim Choon ("TKC") and one Madam Chang Ying (deceased).

[4] The particulars of the Company's shareholdings are as follows:

[5] The particulars of the Company's current board of directors are as follows:

[6] The 1st Respondent owns a hotel known as Cairnhill Hotel together with the land on which it is situated. Pursuant to a tenancy agreement, the 1st Respondent collects rent f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top