HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ECONPILE (M) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ASM DEVELOPMENT (KL) SDN BHD – Respondent
Introduction
[1] By consent of the parties, three applications were heard together. These are-
(a) the application by Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd ('Econpile') in the Amended Originating Summons ('O.S.') No. WA-24C-113- 07/2019, which was first dated 1 July 2019 and thereafter re-dated as 17 September 2019, to enforce the Adjudication Decision made by the learned Adjudicator, Mr Rajendra Navaratnam on 21 June 2019 and the Supplementary Decision dated 7 August 2019 (collectively referred to as the 'said Adjudication Decision') pursuant to s 28 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 [Act 746] ('CIPAA') and O 69A, r 5 of the Rules of 2012 ('RoC 2012') and/ or the inherent jurisdiction of the Court ('Enforcement Application');
(b) the application by ASM Development (KL) Sdn Bhd ('ASM') in O.S. No. WA-24C-118-07/2019 for the said Adjudication Decision to be stayed pending the conclusion of the arbitration where the provisions referred to in the intitulement are s 16 CIPAA, O 7 rr 2 and 3, and O 69A, r 4 RoC 2012 ('Stay Application'); and
(c) ASM's application in O.S. No. WA-24C-173-09/2019 to set aside the said Adjudication Decision pursuant to s 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.