HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ASM DEVELOPMENT (KL) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ECONPILE (M) SDN BHD & ANOTHER CASE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] These are cross applications to set aside and enforce an adjudication decision made under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA").
[2] The Plaintiff in Originating Summons No WA-24C-253-11/2019 ("OS 1") and the Defendant in Originating Summons No WA-24C-200-10/2019 ("OS 2") is a private limited company involved in property development business.
[3] The Defendant in OS 1 and the Plaintiff in OS 2 is also a private limited company involved in bored piling and foundation work business.
[4] For easy of reference, the parties will hereinafter be addressed as ASM and EP respectively.
Background And Preliminary
[5] By a letter of award dated 26 September 2019 ("Contract"), ASM appointed EP as the contractor to carry out the Work Package 1: Diaphragm Wall, Contiguous Bored Pile, Earthworks, Piling Works and Basement Structure Works (Basement 2 to LG 1) for the project known as "Cadangan Pembangunan Bercampur 69 Tingkat Yang Mengandungi 7 Blok Pangsapuri Servis (4214 unit) Di Atas Lot 36190, Mukim Petaling, Kuala Lumpur" ("Works")
[6] The Contract incorporated the PAM Conditions of Contract 2006 Edition (With Quantities) ("P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.