SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 1279

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
TAN THAN KAU – Appellant
Versus
CHING KOOI CHOO – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Poh Ban Chuan,Poh Jun Hon ,Respondent Advocate: Tan Yew Hong,Lee Shih En

JUDGMENT

Amarjeet Singh Serjit JC:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court at George Town allowing an application for summary judgment under O 14 of the Rules of 2012. Judgment was entered for a sum of RM863,000.00 as agreed liquidated damages under a Call and Put Option Agreement dated 19 February 2019 ("the Option Agreement"). On 28 December 2021, I allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to the Court below for trial.

[2] For ease of reference the parties referred to are as they were in the Court below.

The Facts

[3] The facts stated in the affidavit of the parties are largely undisputed. The only dispute raised by the defendant was that he was not served with the put option notice as required by the Option Agreement.

[4] The salient facts are as follows. The plaintiff was the legal registered owner of 8,200,000.00 ordinary shares of D'Nonce Technology Berhad. On 19 February 2019 the plaintiff and defendant executed the Option Agreement. In consideration of granting the call option in respect of 4,100,000 shares within a stipulated period the defendant agreed to grant the plaintiff the put option whereby the plaintiff may at any time during the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top