SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 1991

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
AGESON BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
DATO FOO CHU JONG & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Tan Xue Qi ,Respondent Advocate: Rex Kuan Kai Tat

JUDGMENT

Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin J:

Introduction

[1] The 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th Defendant applied to strike out the Writ and Statement of Claim pursuant to O 18 r 19(1) (a), (b) and/or (d) and/or O 92 r 4 of the Rules of 2012 as documented in encl 33, 35 and 37 respectively. This Court allowed the applications and struck out the Plaintiff's claim with costs.

[2] This is the Grounds of Judgment of this Court.

Background Facts

[3] Prinsiptek (M) Sdn Bhd ("PMSB") is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Plaintiff. The 1st and 2nd Defendants were the former directors of PMSB until the date of their resignation on 5 September 2019.

[4] In 2016, PMSB secured a construction contract from Qaiser Harta PMC Sdn Bhd on a fixed and lump sum contract of RM314,856,950 ("Letter of Award") in respect of the project known as "Proposed Construction of 1 Block of 44 Storey Apartments (1,068 units) including 8 Storey Podium Parking and Resident Facilities on Lot 30195 (formerly Lot: 1132), Jalan Dato Senu 3, Mukim of Setapak, Federal Territory, Kuala Lumpur for Messrs. SPNB Aspirasi Sdn Bhd" ("Project").

[5] PMSB engaged several consultants, subcontractors and suppliers to complete the Project to perform and ca


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top