HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
POOVANESWARAN RAVE – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] By way of Notice of Motion (encl 1) the Applicant prays for an order that:
i) he be discharged and acquitted ("dilepaskan dan dibebaskan") from detention;
ii) that he be granted bail for the charge brought against him pursuant to s 26J of the Anti-Trafficking In Persons And Anti-Smuggling Of Migrants Act 2007 Act 670 ("ATIPSOM");
iii) damages be assessed for his detention;
iv) such further or other relief as this Honourable Court may seem fit and just.
[2] On 11 November 2022, I had allowed a writ of habeas corpus to be issued for the Applicant to be released, and these are the grounds for the decision made.
Nature Of Application - Writ Of Habeas Corpus
[3] In the intitulement of the Notice of Motion, the Applicant made reference which in effect meant that he is giving notice that he is relying upon s 26J ATIPSOM, art 5 (2) of the Federal Constitution , ss 365 to 367 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Revised 1999) ("CPC") and O 92 (4) of the Rules of 2012 ("ROC").
[4] Section 26J ATIPSOM provides that:
"Any person being the owner, operator or master of any conveyance who engages in the conveyance of smuggled migrants commits an offence and shall, o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.