SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 267

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
HOE CHEE LIANG & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Zulfaqar Zikry ,Respondent Advocate: Walter Pereira

JUDGMENT

Muniandy Kannyappan J:

Background Facts

[1] Case is about Ho Chee Liang, the first defendant (D1) who had breached two scholarship cum study leave agreements. With the scholarship, D1 had pursued his post graduate studies at the United States of America (USA), fully funded by plaintiff, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). Plaintiff, a tertiary institution has then sued D1 and his guarantors, second to forth defendants (D2 to D4) for breach of the scholarship agreements, vide writ of summons at the Sessions Court, Shah Alam.

[2] An application to strike out the writ and statement of claim (SOC) by plaintiff was made by all defendants. The sessions Court judge (SCJ) who heard the application had allowed the writ dated 10 November 2020 and SOC to be struck out with an order of costs of RM3000. It was allowed pursuant to summary procedure under O 18 r 19 of the Rules of 2012 (ROC).

[3] This judgment would trace facts of case, bearing in mind mantle of the dispute, if UPM had overstepped the time frame allowed by law to recover monies expended on D1 resulting from breach of the two scholarship agreements.

[4] D1 was an ex-tutor of UPM. He was awarded two scholarships, one to pursue his


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top