Yes, this case the court dismissed the minority oppression claims. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the necessary elements of oppression, including proof of oppressive conduct, misappropriation of funds, neglect in managing the company, or any other prejudicial acts. The court also concluded that the plaintiff's actions, such as abandoning his role and not providing sufficient evidence, undermined his claims of oppression. As a result, the originating summons was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the defendants (!) (!) (!) (!) .