Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
RAI – Appellant
Versus
AVA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim relief application for child access and maintenance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court to address child access and maintenance issues. (Para 6) |
| 3. best interest of the child and parental roles. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. defendant's allegations against plaintiff for access limitations. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. evaluation of allegations and their impact on access. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. understanding 'welfare of the child' in custody matters. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. phased access plan for the child. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 8. child maintenance obligations of parents. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 9. spousal maintenance considerations. (Para 35 , 36) |
| 10. assessment of spousal maintenance based on means and needs. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
Introduction
[1] This was the Plaintiff Husband's application ("this Application") for interim relief in relation to, inter alia, access of the child to the marriage, as well as the amount of child maintenance that he was obliged to pay to the Defendant Wife.
[2] In view of the privacy of the parties and sensitivity of issues in these proceedings, the Plaintiff and Defendant have been anonymis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
