HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CHRIS CHRISTIAN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case against three accused charged for drug trafficking. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. key issues concerning disclosure rights under s 112 cpc. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the privilege of witness statements. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
[1] All three applicants/accused were charged on 30 June 2017 for drug trafficking, an offence punishable under s 39B(1)(a) of the DDA 1952. The case for the prosecution had been concluded. On 27 September 2019, I found that the prosecution has made out a prima facie case against the accused and called upon all the accused to enter their defence.
[2] On the same day, the defence counsel for the 2nd accused wrote to the prosecution requesting for a copy of s 112 statement by those witnesses who were offered to the defence to be furnished to the defence counsel. The relevant excerpt is as follows:
"2. Tujuan kami menulis surat ini kepada Tuan adalah untuk memohon supaya sesalinan kenyataan saksi-saksi yang direkodkan di bawah s 112 Kanun Tatacara Jenayah bagi saksi-saksi yang ditawarkan kepada pembelaan dapat dibekalkan kepada pihak kami dengan kadar segera."
[3] The defence counsel, in supporting the request ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.