SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 984

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
MAPLE AUTOSTYLING SDN BHD (PETITIONER) – Appellant
Versus
TIC TECHNOLOGIES SDN BHD; & PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL S.... – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of the applicant and respondent's financial interaction. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
[1] The Applicant / Perusahaan Otomobil Sdn Bhd filed a Notice of Motion dated 12 November 2018, pursuant to ss 451 and 517 of the Companies Act and the Companies (Winding-Up) Rules 1972 and /or the inherent jurisdiction of this Honourable Court for the followings order:

a) That leave be granted to commence action against the Respondent;

b) That the decision of Yew Fooi, the liquidator of the Respondent to reject the POD of the Applicant filed on 28 November 2014, made on 24 October 2018 pursuant to the Applicant's solicitor's letter dated 9 October 2018 be reversed;

c) That in any event, Yew Fooi does give a full account in a manner satisfactory to this Honourable Court of the affairs of the Respondent since the same has been taken into his custody, control or under his control upon his appointment.

d) That Yew Fooi cause and take necessary steps to admit and repay the sum of RM11,248,862.50 or such sum that is recoverable pari passu, in order of the Companies Act 2016 , to the Applicant within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of the sealed Order on the solicit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top