Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
ANN JOO INTEGRATED STEEL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LIM CHUAN HOCK & SONS SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of cipaa adjudication and contract basis. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. overview of context and parties involved alluding to the cipaa. (Para 9 , 12) |
| 3. grounds for the challenge to the adjudicator's decision. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 4. explanation of the interim relief nature under cipaa. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's view on jurisdiction and natural justice. (Para 23 , 39) |
| 6. judicial reasoning concerning adjudicator's discretion and implications of contract terms. (Para 36) |
[1] This is another application that came before me to set aside the decision of the adjudicator under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA") after Harmony Teamwork Construction Sdn Bhd v. Vital Talent Sdn Bhd , [2017] 4 AMR 580.
[2] The Plaintiff is a private limited company and the employer of the project to carry out construction work known as "Cadangan Kerja Tambahan Ke Atas Bangunan Kilang Sediada Ann Joo Integrated Steel Sdn Bhd di atas Lot 1227 & 78 Dan Sebahagian Lot 1225 & 1236, Mukim 1, Kawasan Perindustrian Perai, Seberang Perai Tengah Pulau Pinang" ("Works").
[3] The Defendant is also a private limited company and is the contractor appointed by the Plaintiff to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
