SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 511

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP MALAYSIA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LOO CHAY MENG – Respondent


Table of Content
1. several applications regarding injunctive relief and amendments in proceedings. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3)

[1] There are 3 applications involved in this proceedings, two filed by the Plaintiff and one filed by the Defendant:

(a) encl 2 is the Plaintiff's Originating Summons for (i) injunctive relief to restrain the Defendant and/or his agent from taking any execution proceedings or from filing a winding up petition against the Plaintiff in the absence of a judgment; (ii) a declaration that the Plaintiff is not responsible for the further warranties in respect of the vehicle, Volkswagen Passat CC, registration no BLM 7770; (c) costs;

(b) encl 14 is the Plaintiff's application is to amend prayer (b) of the Originating Summons (encl 2) in the following terms: ie "for a declaration that the Plaintiff would not be responsible for the extended warranty of a vehicle of the type Volkswagen Passat CC bearing registration no BLM 7770 between 26 November 2013 till 12 February 2015" (prayer (a)); and costs to be borne by the Plaintiff (prayer (b)); and

(c) encl 9 is the Defendant's application to set aside the ex-parte injunctive order granted on 10 March 2015.

[2] Apart from the Origi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top