SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 670

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
MBSB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
ERAKEMAS SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Lim Pey Tsyr,Eunice Aw Shze Xian ,Respondent Advocate: Mashitah Jamaluddin @ Mohammad Shukri

JUDGMENT

(Stay Of Winding Up Petition)

Kenneth St James JC:

Prelusion

[1] The Respondent (R) applies for a stay of this winding up proceeding pending the Ministry Of Education's (MOE's) payment of Interim Certificate No. 58 and Interim Certificate No 59 to R.

[2] Should a stay of proceedings be granted?

The Pertinent Facts And Chronology Of Proceedings

[3] The MOE awarded a contract to R to build a school. The Petitioner (P) granted banking facilities to R to carry out the construction contract. R defaulted. P filed a civil suit against R.

[4] On 12 April 2023, P and R recorded a Consent Order for R to pay P approximately RM2.812 million and other amounts (Judgment Debt). The Judgment Debt was to be paid from the contract payments the MOE pays R for the construction contract. But if R does not receive the contract payments from the MOE, the Judgment Debt must still be paid by R. R defaulted under the Consent Order.

[5] In June 2023, P issued and served the s 466 Companies Act 2016 statutory notice on R. R failed to comply.

[6] In July 2023, P presented this winding up Petition against R.

[7] In September 2023, R filed an application to stay this Petition. I fixed R's stay application and th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top