HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
MBSB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
ERAKEMAS SDN BHD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Stay Of Winding Up Petition)
Prelusion
[1] The Respondent (R) applies for a stay of this winding up proceeding pending the Ministry Of Education's (MOE's) payment of Interim Certificate No. 58 and Interim Certificate No 59 to R.
[2] Should a stay of proceedings be granted?
The Pertinent Facts And Chronology Of Proceedings
[3] The MOE awarded a contract to R to build a school. The Petitioner (P) granted banking facilities to R to carry out the construction contract. R defaulted. P filed a civil suit against R.
[4] On 12 April 2023, P and R recorded a Consent Order for R to pay P approximately RM2.812 million and other amounts (Judgment Debt). The Judgment Debt was to be paid from the contract payments the MOE pays R for the construction contract. But if R does not receive the contract payments from the MOE, the Judgment Debt must still be paid by R. R defaulted under the Consent Order.
[5] In June 2023, P issued and served the s 466 Companies Act 2016 statutory notice on R. R failed to comply.
[6] In July 2023, P presented this winding up Petition against R.
[7] In September 2023, R filed an application to stay this Petition. I fixed R's stay application and th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.