SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1292

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PERWIRA BINTANG HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. jurisdiction and basis for claim submission. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. details of claim and contract conditions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. arbitral proceedings summary. (Para 10 , 11)

[1] The Plaintiff is invoking the Court's jurisdiction under subparagraph 37(1)(a)(iv), paragraph 37(2)(b) and sub-s 37(3) of the Arbitration Act 2005 [Act 646] to set aside certain paragraphs of the Final Award dated 24 October 2012; namely paragraphs 117, 118, 120 to 125, 139 and 140. Alternatively, the Plaintiff seeks to set aside that Final Award, be it in whole or in part or to vary the same pursuant to s 42 of Act 646. Under s 42, the Plaintiff identified several questions of law for the Court's determination, the details of which will be examined later.

The Plaintiff's Claim

[2] By Letter of Intent dated 5 February 2003, the Defendant had offered to the Plaintiff a tender for a project known as "Cadangan Pembinaan Kompleks KDN/KA & LOGISTIK, Bukit Aman, Wilayah Persekutuan direct negotiations based on a "design and build" arrangement. The Plaintiff successfully tendered for the works and after negotiations the Defendant accepted the Plaintiff's offer vide letter of acceptance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top