LEE AIK CHONG vs PERDANA MERCHANT BANKERS BERHAD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2013 MarsdenLR 1198

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEE AIK CHONG – Appellant
Versus
PERDANA MERCHANT BANKERS BERHAD – Respondent

Table of Content
1. notice of appeal details and initial bankruptcy background. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. details of the public examination and financial disclosures. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. dgi's reports on the discharge application. (Para 10)
4. arguments made by the bankrupt concerning discharge. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. jc's arguments against the bankrupt's discharge. (Para 14 , 15)
6. court's overview of the discharge application process. (Para 16)

[1] By a Notice of Appeal to Judge in Chambers dated 3 May 2013 the Bankrupt appealed against the decision of the learned Senior Assistant Registrar (SAR) on 22 April 2013 dismissing the Bankrupt's application for discharge with no order as to costs.

Background

[2] The Bankrupt was adjudged a bankrupt on 14 May 2001 on the Petition of the JC. On 13 August 2007, the Bankrupt applied to discharge himself from bankruptcy pursuant to s 33(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1967 (BA) (1st Discharge Application). However on the request of the JD's Creditors, on 17 August 2007, a public examination of the JD was conducted pursuant to s 17(2) of the said Act.

[3] On 8 October 2007, the learned Senior Assistant Registrar dismissed the 1st Discharge Applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2013 MarsdenLR 1198

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURLEE AIK CHONG – AppellantVersusPERDANA MERCHANT BANKERS BERHAD – Respondent

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEE AIK CHONG – Appellant
Versus
PERDANA MERCHANT BANKERS BERHAD – Respondent