SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 4582

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
RHB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MILLENNIUM SKILL TRAINING ACADEMY SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
[Suit No: WA-22NCC-63-02/2023]



Petitioner Advocates:Muhamad Mizan Omar ,Respondent Advocate: Dalveena Korotana

The court held that the absolute assignment of properties allows the Plaintiff to auction them and claim outstanding debts, with the Certificate of Indebtedness serving as conclusive evidence, shifting the burden of proof to the Defendants.

Headnote:(A) Civil Law Act 1956 - Section 4(3) - Rules of Court 2012 - Order 14 - Summary judgment - Plaintiff claimed RM3,895,975.12 plus interest due to loan defaults amidst COVID-19 - Defendants argued action was premature and unjust enrichment due to property assignments - Court found assignments were absolute, allowing auction of properties - Defendants failed to show triable issues or manifest errors in the Certificate of Indebtedness - Plaintiff's claim for interest upheld per contractual terms. (Paras 1-55)

Facts of the case:
The 1st Defendant obtained three loans amounting to RM3,680,000.00 secured by properties and personal guarantees. The 1st Defendant defaulted on payments due to COVID-19 impacts and proposed lower repayments, which the Plaintiff rejected before initiating legal action. (Paras 3-8)

Findings of Court:
The Plaintiff met the requirements for summary judgment under O 14, with no triable issues presented by the Defendants. The Plaintiff is entitled to pursue the auction of properties and claim the full outstanding amount. (Paras 53-55)

Issues: Whether the assignment of properties constituted an absolute transfer or a charge, the validity of the Certificate of Indebtedness, and the appropriateness of the interest rate claimed. (Paras 2, 36, 45)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Deeds of Assignment allowed the Plaintiff to auction properties without unjust enrichment occurring, and the Certificate of Indebtedness was conclusive evidence of debt, shifting the burden to the Defendants to prove otherwise. (Paras 20-34)

Result: Enclosure 13 allowed with costs to the Plaintiff. (Para 55)

JUDGMENT

Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad J:

[1] COVID-19 upended markets and crushed businesses, leaving countless loan agreements in shambles. So the borrower fell into arrears, and long negotiations with the bank proved fruitless, prompting the present debt recovery action. The borrower and guarantors now cry foul, alleging settlement talks were still ongoing when the legal claim unexpectedly surfaced.

[2] Yet beyond assertions of prematurity, the defendants dispute the very nature of the loan security - an assignment of property interests - which the bank contends allows it to liquidate the security. The pivotal issue thus emerges: does this assignment amount to an absolute transfer of rights empowering the plaintiff to unilaterally sell the assets? Or is it a mere charge granting limited rights subject to court sanction? The loan may have soured, but legal rights and remedies turn on whether assignment was total or partial. For between absolute transfer and restrictive charge lies a gulf of consequence should negotiations break down. On which side the agreement truly lies will determine if this action jumps the gun.

Background Facts

[3] The 1st Defendant, Millennium Skill Training Academy Sdn Bhd, obtained three term loans (Term Loan 1, Term Loan 2 and Term Loan 3) from the Plaintiff, RHB Bank Berhad, between August 2016 to September 2016, amounting to RM3,680,000.00. The loans were secured by personal guarantees from the 2nd to 4th Defendants. The loans were documented by the Facilities Agreement dated 15 November 2016 and the Facility Agreement dated 17 March 2017 ("the Facility Agreements"). The personal guarantees were documented by a Personal Guarantee dated 15 November 2016 ("the Personal Guarantee") executed by the 2nd Defendant, 3rd Defendant and 1st Defendant.

[4] The 1st Defendant also executed 3 Deeds of Assignment dated 15 November 2016 and 17 March 2017 ("Deeds of Assignment") in favour of the Plaintiff, assigning the 1st Defendant's rights, title, interest and benefits in 3 properties, Lot 19, 20 and 21 held under title GM 3547, Lot 1475, in Mukim Serendah, District of Hulu Selangor, to the Plaintiff as security for the repayment of the three term loans granted.

[5] The term loans had monthly installment amounts due from the 1st Defendant to the Plaintiff. The 1st Defendant paid the monthly installments from 2016 until 21 August 2019, but was allegedly in default of RM46,773.03 as of 21 August 2019.

[6] When movement restrictions were imposed in Malaysia due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 1st Defendant's business suffered severely, making it harder for them to continue paying the monthly installments. The 1st Defendant is a company that has been providing vocational trainings to underprivileged students since 2009, including through the Malaysian Skills Malaysia programme. The 1st Defendant was also appointed in June 2021 as a training provider under a government programme.

[7] Despite the COVID-19 impact, the 1st Defendant endeavoured to make monthly installment payments, although at lower amounts that were at times agreed to by the Plaintiff. This included monthly amounts of RM3,000 that the 1st Defendant had continued to pay. However, the 1st Defendant was eventually unable to electronically deposit these RM3,000.00 monthly sums into the loan accounts.

[8] On 14 February 2023, the Plaintiff filed the present legal action claiming RM3,895,975.12 plus interest of 9.95%. Concurrently, the Plaintiff attempted to auction off the 3 properties belonging to the 1st Defendant that were pledged as security for the loans, through auctions on 7 April 2023 and 31 May 2023.

The Plaintiff's Claim

[9] In this action the Plaintiff is claiming:

a) RM1,403,826.01 due under Term Loan 1 as of 7 February 2023;

b) RM1,412,609.24 due under Term Loan 2 as of 7 February 2023;

c) RM1,079,539.87 due under Term Loan 3 as of 7 February 2023; and

d) Interest on Term Loans 1, 2 and 3 at the rate of 3.50% per annum above the Plaintiff's Base Lending Rate (whic


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top