SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 1505

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
INNOVANS PALM INDUSTRIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LEMBAGA MINYAK SAWIT MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Terence Chan,Bryan Goh ,Respondent Advocate: Hisham Ismail

JUDGMENT

George Varughese:

Introduction

[1] Enclosure 1 is the applicant's judicial review application, seeking orders for certiorari, declaration, prohibition and mandamus under O 53, Rules of 2012 (ROC 2012).

[2] In encl 1, the applicant challenged the decision of the 2nd respondent in rejecting the applicant's claim of ownership and request of return of 4,579.91 metric tonnes of used cooking oil (UCO) seized by the respondents on 26 May 2020 under the Malaysian Palm Oil Board Act 1998 ( MPOBA 1998) (Impugned Decision).

[3] The applicant, inter alia, sought for the following orders:

(i) an order of certiorari to quash the Impugned Decision;

(ii) a declaration that the Impugned Decision is erroneous in law and/or ultra vires and/or irrational and/or illegal and/or in breach of natural justice;

(iii) an order of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from taking any steps to enforce and/or assert any right of ownership or to sell the UCO;

(iv) an order of mandamus to compel the 1st and/or 2nd respondent to release and/or return the UCO or the proceeds of any sale of the UCO and all books, records, documents or other articles seized by the respondents to the applicant within seven (7) d


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top