SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 909

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
SIA TEIK KEAT – Appellant
Versus
MICRO CARBIDE ENGINEERING SENDIRIAN BERHAD & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Teh Chiew Yin,Nicole Koh Sui Fen ,Respondent Advocate: Cassandra Lee

JUDGMENT

Quay Chew Soon J:

Introduction

[1] The Plaintiff ("P") filed this originating summons on 16 August 2023. By the originating summons, P seeks for leave to commence a derivative action in the name of the 1st Defendant ("Company") against the 2nd Defendant ("D2") and the 3rd Defendant ("D3"). And to obtain the documents set out in prayer (c) of the originating summons.

[2] On 29 March 2024, I dismissed the originating summons. Here are the grounds of my decision.

The Complaints Of The Plaintiff

[3] The complaints of P can be summarised as follows:

(a) Complaint No 1. The RM42.6 million of directors' remuneration and other benefits paid to D2 and D3 for the financial years 2015 to 2020.

This is P's primary complaint. P alleges that the aforesaid directors' remunerations and other benefits were never approved by the shareholders of the Company. As such, art 67 of the Company's constitution and s 230(3) of the Companies Act 2016 have not been complied with.

(b) Complaint No 2. EPF (Employees Provident Fund) contribution to D2.

P alleges that there has been an excessive EPF contribution to D2 on the account of the Company, which exceeds the rate of 19% permissible for tax deduction provi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top