HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
FIVESTAR LUXURY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
DAYA INTELEK USAHASAMA SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claims and injunction application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the contractual obligations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. change in management affects obligations. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. defendants' defense and counterclaims. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. details of the additional affidavit. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 6. factors for granting an interim injunction. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. ruling on admissibility of additional affidavit. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. conclusion on injunction application. (Para 43) |
(Admissibility Of Affidavit Filed After Proceeding Commenced)
Prelusion
[1] The Plaintiff (P) filed this suit against the two Defendants:
(1) for the specific performance of a contract between them;
(2) for the removal of a private caveat lodged over the subject land; and
(3) for damages.
[2] P then applied for an interim injunction (Injunction Application) for Orders against the Defendants and any person related to them, including Orders to restrain them:
(1) from dealing with the land;
(2) from registering any encumbrance over the land; and
(3) from making any announcements, any
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.