HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEE YAN CHWAN & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs allege bank's breach of confidentiality. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. insufficient facts to support claim against the bank. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. court's discretion in striking out unsustainable claims. (Para 19 , 20) |
Introduction
[1] In this case the Defendant applied to strike out the Plaintiffs claim under O 18 r 19 of the Rules 2012 ("the Rules"). Order 18 r 19 of the Rules stipulates as follows:
19. Striking out pleadings and endorsements (O 18 r 19)
(1) The Court may at any stage of the proceedings order to be struck out or amended any pleading or the endorsement, of any writ in the action, or anything in any pleading or in the endorsement, on the ground that-
(a) it discloses no reasonable cause of action or defence, as the case may be;
(b) it is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious;
(c) it may prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action; or
(d) it is otherwise an abuse of the process of the Court, and may order the action to be stayed or dismissed or judgment to be entered accordingly, as the case may be.
(2) No evidence shall be admissible on an application under subparagraph (1)(a).
The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.