SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2406

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KOTA KINABALU
FOONG KIT HUR & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
JEROME JUSTIN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ken Yong ,Respondent Advocate: Adam Chin,Mortimer Maluda

Table of Content
1. overview of the vehicular accident and claims. (Para 1 , 5)
2. facts surrounding the vehicular collision and initial rulings on liability. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments regarding claims for damages and their justification. (Para 6 , 12 , 14)
4. submissions regarding damages and necessity of evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

[1] This is the Appellants' appeal against part of the decision of the learned Sessions' Court Judge ("SCJ") after trial at Kota Kinabalu given on the 15 October 2015 ("the said judgment").

[2] The Respondent has also filed a cross-appeal against the said judgment.

Brief Facts

[3] The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

1. The 1st and 2nd Appellants' claim arose from a collision between the 1st Appellant's vehicle, namely, an Isuzu TFR pickup truck bearing the registration No SA 7972-X, driven by the 2nd Appellant at the material time and the Respondent's vehicle, namely a Proton sedan car bearing the registration No SA 7286-H driven by the Respondent at the material time.

2. On 2 July 2011 at about 10.15pm, the 2nd Appellant was driving the 1st Appellant's vehicle along Papar-Penampang Road from Papar towards Dongonggon. At the material time, the Responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top