2015 MarsdenLR 1498
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
ABDUL HAMID MOHD AMIN – Appellant
Versus
RAMACON CORPORATION SDN BHD – Respondent
[Civil Appeal No: 12BNCVC-12-03/2015]
Important Points
Subject
Civil Law - Appeal Process
Act Referred
Headnote
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal arises from a debt claim decision reflecting necessary legal procedures. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the extension of time and compliance. (Para 2) |
[1] This application arises out of an appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court in a civil suit for a debt due for services rendered by the Appellant/Plaintiff to the Respondent/Defendant.
[2] The Appellant vide this Notice of Application is seeking an extension of time pursuant to O 3 r 5(1) of the Rules of , 2012 (' ROC ') and the inherent jurisdiction of the Court under O 92, r 4, to file and serve the Appeal Record ('AR') out of the prescribed time under O 55 r 4(1), and the inherent jurisdiction of the Court under O 92, r 4, . Further, that the AR which was filed in Court on 9 April 2015 and served on the same day on the Respondent's solicitors be deemed as proper filing and effective service respectively.