HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
ABDUL HAMID MOHD AMIN – Appellant
Versus
RAMACON CORPORATION SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal arises from a debt claim decision reflecting necessary legal procedures. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the extension of time and compliance. (Para 2) |
[1] This application arises out of an appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court in a civil suit for a debt due for services rendered by the Appellant/Plaintiff to the Respondent/Defendant.
[2] The Appellant vide this Notice of Application is seeking an extension of time pursuant to O 3 r 5(1) of the Rules of , 2012 (' ROC ') and the inherent jurisdiction of the Court under O 92, r 4, to file and serve the Appeal Record ('AR') out of the prescribed time under O 55 r 4(1), and the inherent jurisdiction of the Court under O 92, r 4, . Further, that the AR which was filed in Court on 9 April 2015 and served on the same day on the Respondent's solicitors be deemed as proper filing and effective service respectively.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.