Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin J:

Introduction

[1] This judgment concerns the following four appeals filed by the third to seventh defendants ("the banks") against this court's decision with regards to the enclosures below:

(i) enclosure 45: an application filed by Lo Hooi Lin and Maznah binti Baba, ie, the third and fourth alleged contemnors to set aside ex parte leave for committal dated 20 January 2016 obtained by the banks;

(ii) enclosure 47: an application filed by the second defendant, ie, the second alleged contemnor ("Pavilion Yields") to set aside ex parte leave for committal dated 20 January 2016 obtained by the banks;

(iii) enclosure 61: an application filed by Tan Sri Dato' Lim Cheng Pow, the first alleged contemnor ("Tan Sri Lim") to set aside ex parte leave for committal dated 20 January 2016 obtained by the banks; and

(iv) enclosure 38: the banks' application for a committal order against the alleged contemnors.

[2] On 23 October 2019, this court allowed encls 45, 47 and 61 with costs. Consequently, encl 38 fell and was struck out. Given the fact that encl 38 wasnot heard on merits and the striking out was merely a consequential order, this judgment will only concern en