Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:

1. The court emphasized that unfair conduct by majority shareholders, such as wrongful removal of minority directors, violates principles of fair dealing and can be declared void under relevant statutory provisions (!) .

2. The principle of majority rule in company management does not permit actions that are oppressive or that disregard the interests of minority shareholders. Decisions must adhere to statutory requirements and the company's articles of association to prevent unfair prejudice (!) (!) .

3. The court declared the appointment of the company secretary and the removal of the petitioners from their positions as null and void, underscoring the importance of following fair procedures and statutory obligations (!) .

4. The court found that the petitioners substantiated claims of oppression, leading to a ruling in their favor regarding their removals and the appointment issues (!) .

5. The court's ruling entailed that the appointments and removals in question be declared invalid, and the petitioners were entitled to arrears of remuneration with interest (!) .

6. The conduct of the majority shareholders, including the appointment of a secretary and the removal of minority directors, must be conducted in accordance with the company's articles of association and within the bounds of fair dealing principles, rather than solely on majority rule (!) (!) .

7. The internal management rule, which typically restricts courts from intervening in internal company affairs, does not preclude judicial review when conduct is oppressive, unfair, or prejudicial to minority shareholders (!) .

8. The appointment of the company secretary and the subsequent removal of the petitioners from their positions were scrutinized as potentially illegal actions that should be declared null and void if found to breach fair procedures and statutory requirements (!) .

These points highlight that even within the context of majority rule and internal management, fair dealing and statutory compliance are essential to prevent oppression and protect minority shareholders' rights.