HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LIM GIM ENG & ORS – Appellant
Versus
ERNST & YOUNG & ORS; ERNST & YOUNG (THIRD PARTY) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for stay based on arbitration agreement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background on sjam and e & y's relationship. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. background facts of the case (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
[1] Encl (46) is an application by the 3rd Party, Ernst & Young ("E & Y" ), under s 10 of the Arbitration Act 2005 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of the Court for the following orders:
(i) that the third party proceedings commenced by the 4th Defendant, SJ Asset Management Sdn Bhd ("SJAM") be stayed; and
(ii) the matter be referred to arbitration;
[2] The grounds of this application are as follows:
(i) The third party proceedings relate to matters which are the subject of an arbitration agreement between SJAM and E & Y.
(ii) The arbitration agreement is not null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed.
(iii) That SJAM has referred the matter to arbitration.
(iv) The third party proceedings ought to be stayed to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting decisions on the same matters by this Honourable Court and the Arbitral Tribunal.
The Salient Facts
[3] Prior to its being wound up on 14 October 2010, SJAM was a licensed investment fund manager wh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.