SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 253

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PACIFIC & ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
AZHAR AZIZAN; MOHD ASYRAF YUSOFF (INTERVENER) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction to intended intervention and appeal (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3)
2. establishment of undisputed facts surrounding the case (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

[1] This matter came before this Court as the hearing of the Intended Intervenor's Application Enclosure 7 for inter alia the following orders:-

"2. Bahawa Pemohon diberi kebenaran untuk mencelah di dalam prosiding ini dan dinamakan sebagai Defendan Kedua;

3. Perintah Deklarasi yang diberikan oleh Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini pada 14 Mei 2013 diketepikan;

4. Susulan daripada Perintah dua (2) dan tiga (3) di atas:

a) Plaintif Pacific Orient Insurance Co Berhad (No. Syarikat 12557-W) diberi kebenaran untuk meminda tajuk di dalam Saman Pemula dan menyerahkan Saman Pemula terpinda kepada Peguamcara Pemohon sebagai Peguamcara Defendan Kedua;

b) Pemohon diberi kebenaran untuk memfailkan Afadavit Jawapan/Bantahan dalam masa 14 hari dari tarikh Saman Pemula Terpinda bermeterai diserahkan kepada Peguamcara pemohon."

[2] The Court dismissed encl 7 and the Intended Intervenor now appeals against the Court's decision.

[3] In handing down its decision on 22 November 2013 the Court did state that proper grounds would foll

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top