SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 1270

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
RICHARD CURTIS & CO SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KHATIJAH ABDUL MAJID – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff seeks return of overpaid sum. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. evidence presented in trial. (Para 4 , 6)
3. disagreements on issues for trial. (Para 5 , 7)
4. defendant's claim of abuse of process. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
5. plaintiff failed to prove misrepresentation. (Para 51 , 52)
6. court's decision on both claims dismissed. (Para 63 , 66)

[1] The plaintiff, Richard Curtis & Co Sdn Bhd previously known as Inter-Bell Realty Sdn Bhd ("the plaintiff") had commenced this action against the defendant seeking for the return of the sum of RM748,024.50, which sum was said to have been overpaid to the defendant pursuant to a sale and purchase agreement dated 16 March 2001 ("the agreement"). The subject matter of the agreement was a piece of land known as HS (D) 77734, Mukim Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur ("the subject land"). The plaintiff alleged that the defendant had only delivered land measuring 3003 square meters instead of 3602 square meters as stated in the agreement. Hence the plaintiff alleged that defendant had not conveyed land measuring 599 square meters the value of which worked out to be RM748,024.50 (RM4,381,123 divided by 3602 square meters = RM1,21

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top