SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 2497

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
KARUNAMOORTHY RAMASAMY – Appellant
Versus
HARIHARAN SUBRAMANIAM & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Rajivan Nambiar ,Respondent Advocate: Muniandy Vestanathan

JUDGMENT

Amarjeet Singh Serjit Singh JC:

Introduction

[1] In the original action the plaintiff, Karunamoorthy a/l Ramasamy, a sole proprietor trading as Era Hemas Trading brought an action against three defendants, Hariharan a/l Subramaniam ( Hariharan), Asokan a/l Palaniandy (Asokan) and Ezy Group Berhad formally known as EZYFX Berhad (EGB). Hariharan and Asokan were the only directors of EGB.

[2] Hariharan and EGB in response to the statement of claim filed a defence and counterclaim which they subsequently amended. They cited themselves as the plaintiffs in the counterclaim and in the title to the action cited the following five persons: Karunamoorthy in his personal capacity, Aravanthan a/l Subramaniam (Aravanthan), Muhammad Denial Dass (Muhammad Denial), Mathialagan a/l Maniam (Mathialagan) and Reeta a/p Jaya (Reeta) as the 1st to 5th defendants in the counterclaim.

[3] Karunamoorthy and Aravanthan then moved this Court by way of a notice of application (enclosure 23) under O 15 r 5 and/or O 18 r 19(1) and/or O 94 r 4 of the Rules of 2012 for an order that the amended counterclaim be struck out against them. For ease of reference all rules hereinafter stated refer to the Rules of


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top