SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1300

HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
AMARJIT KAUR ATMA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GURBACHAN SINGH WAZIR SINGH – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:,Respondent Advocate:

Table of Content
1. application to rescind maintenance order due to changed circumstances. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. legal standards for material change in circumstances. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's findings on evidence of financial status. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
Abdul Wahab Mohamed J:

Introduction

[1] This is an application by the Respondent Husband ("RH") via Enclosure 162 dated 24 February 2023 ("Enclosure 162") to rescind para 1 of the Decree Nisi dated 21 November 2016 ("the Decree Nisi").

[2] Paragraph 1 of the Decree Nisi read as follows:

"1. Responden membayar nafkah kepada Pempetisyen sebanyak RM5,000.00 sebulan sehingga Pempetisyen berkahwin semula atau Responden tidak peroleh pendapatan lagi."

[3] RH claimed that several material changes of circumstances rendered the need to rescind para 1 of the Decree Nisi on the following grounds:

(i) That the RH is an elderly 68 years of age, with old age sickness and cardiovascular disease and had suffered 2 heart attack; and

(ii) That the RH no longer has a fixed income and has sold the Poliklinik Kanna which was the RH's sole income.

Background Facts

[4] The RH was self-employed as a doctor at Polikli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top