HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PT SANDIPALA ARTHAPUTRA – Appellant
Versus
MUEHLBAUER TECHNOLOGIES SDN BHD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] The plaintiff's cause of action was based on the common law rule of recognising and enforcing a foreign judgment in personam in Malaysia. This Court has heard the oral submission and read the extensive written submissions of the parties' counsels respectively. On 12 May 2021, this Court allowed the plaintiff to enter judgment against the defendant. The reasons for the decision of this Court are set out below.
Brief Background Facts
[2] The plaintiff company, an Indonesian entity, brought a civil suit against the one Muehlbauer AG (a German entity) and the defendant, a Malaysian entity, as the first and second defendants respectively, in the South Jakarta District Court (hereafter 'the District Court'). The plaintiff's suit in the District Court was premised on two causes of action, namely, breach of contract and tort of conspiracy (hereafter 'the unlawful act claim'). The latter is considered as an illegal act under
[3] The plaintiff's suit in the District Court stemmed from a contract dated 26 May 2011 which wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.