SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 153

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MUNIANDY NADASAN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
DATO PREM KRISHNA SAHGAL & ORS; DATO JEYARAJ V RATNASWAMY (INTERVENER) – Respondent


[1] On 14 March 2017 the Deputy Registrar (DR) dismissed the Proposed Intervener's application (Enclosure 22) to intervene in the execution proceedings 36-3-03/2015 (Execution Proceedings). Pursuant thereto the Proposed Intervener filed Notice of Appeal to Judge in Chambers (Enclosure 36) dated 22 March 2017 appealing against the said decision of the DR. I subsequently dismissed Enclosure 36 with costs. Thus this appeal filed by the Proposed Intervener.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top