(Court Encl Nos 31 And 38)

A. Introduction

[1] This case discusses whether a party to a consent order may enforce a consent order by way of contempt of Court proceedings when:-

(a) there is no tendency to interfere with the due administration of justice or to subvert the course of justice in connection with legal proceedings;

(b) there is no necessity to maintain or vindicate the authority of the Court;

(c) the applicant for committal proceedings (Applicant) did not comply with certain "procedural safeguards" which are intended to protect the alleged contemnor; and

(d) there is an alternative avenue for the Applicant.

B. Background

[2] The Applicant is an individual who has filed this suit (This Suit) on 16 January 2013 against the following parties:

(a) the first and second defendant companies (1^st and 2^nd Defendants); and

(b) the third to fifth individual defendants (