Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
LICVEM SHIPPING & TRADING APS & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
JLM LOGISTICS (M) SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim includes multiple causes of action against defendants. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. application for discovery based on relevancy for the trial. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court emphasizes specific identification for document requests. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. final ruling allows specific document discovery with costs. (Para 20) |
[1] Before me, there are two separate applications [encls 114 and 126] for discovery of documents under O 24 ROC 2012.
Facts
[2] This is a claim by the plaintiffs against the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants ("the main defendants") for a range of causes of action that inter alia include breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, defamation, fraud, tort of inducement of breach of contract, conspiracy, tort of unlawful interference with business and trade of the plaintiff's company.
[3] It was alleged that, the main defendants, who are the directors and shareholders of the 1st defendant, had contacted the plaintiffs' client, one AEL (Mauritius) Ltd ("AEL Mauritius") that the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants were forming a new company (culminating into the establishment of the 1st defendant) and urged AEL Mauritius to award the 1st
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
