HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PANETRA PARKING SERVICES SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
TTDI HARTA SDN BHD & ANOTHER APPLICATION – Respondent
(Enclosures 9 And 12)
Introdution
[1] These two appeals involve an application by the Plaintiff in encl 9 to disqualify the Defendant's solicitors from acting for the Defendant in this Suit and a counter-application by the Defendant in encl 12 to disqualify the Plaintiffs' solicitors from acting for the Plaintiffs in this Suit.
[2] Enclosure 9 is the Plaintiffs' application under rr 3, 4, 5 and 35 Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978 and under O 92 r 4 Rules of which is the application to order for MESSRS AZLAN SHAH SUKHDEV & CO ("Law Firm ASSC") to withdraw from representing the Defendant in Civil Law case No: BA-22NCC-36- 03/2020 and any matter or action related to Civil Law case No: BA- 22NCC-36-03/2020.
[3] Enclosure 12 is the Defendant's application under rr 3, 4, 5, and 35 of the Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978 and O 92 r 4 of the Rules of 2012, namely application for an order for TETUAN MOHAJI HAZURY & ISMAIL ("Law Firm MHI") to withdraw from representing the Plaintiffs for Civil Suit No: BA-22NCC- 36-03 / 2020 and any matter or action related to Civil Suit No: BA- 22NCC- 36-03/2020.
[4] In respect of encl 9 the follow
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.