HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
JMB SILVERPARK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SILVERPARK SDN BHD & ANOR (ENCLS 1 & 6) – Respondent
[15] The 1st Defendant relied on exhibits ANS-4 and ANS-6 (see 1st Defendant's Affidavit in Reply 2 and 3 in enclosures 9 and 11 respectively). The 1st Defendant averred that exhibit ANS-4 is the official Site Plan (and Location Plan) certified by the Architect in February 1994 and it shows that there is indeed a separate plot and/or parcel which had been comprised for the Clubhouse. The 1st Defendant contended that this separate plot or parcel for the Clubhouse had never been sold and it is shown in the Strata Plan as a parcel, and therefore the Clubhouse is considered a proprietary club owned by the Developer ie the 1st Defendant, and a strata title has to be issued for the Clubhouse.
[16] There is no averment by the 1st Defendant that exhibit ANS-4 is the Approved Plan. The recitals of the statutory SPA only refer to the Building Plans. The 1st Defendant did not disclose the Building Plans or the provisional block plans.
[17] The Site Plan and Location Plan in exhibit ANS-4 has a notation at the far right of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.