SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 2610

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BEDFORD DAMANSARA HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH HASIL DALAM NEGERI – Respondent


Table of Content
1. issue of taxpayer entitlement for deductions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. case law on nature of expenditures related to income tax. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. analysis of taxpayer's expenditures regarding tax liability. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. onus of proof regarding taxpayer negligence and time bar. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. penalties are contingent on valid assessments. (Para 18)
6. court's conclusive view on taxpayer deductions. (Para 19)

[1] This appeal by the Director General of Income Tax ['the DGIT' or 'the Revenue'] had related to the question of whether the expenditures incurred by the taxpayer for years of assessment 2000-2004 could properly be subject to be taxed under the Income Tax Act 1967 ['the ITA of 1967'] or otherwise.

[2] The factual matrix pertaining to this case may be described as follows:

The tax payer was a company whose main business has been involved in the leasing of property or real estate, such as renting out its properties to tenants for payments of rental as consideration. As far as the taxation on rental income was concerned, there appeared to be a non-issue. What had become the issue between the parties in this appeal had been whether

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top