Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
NG TAI YUAN – Appellant
Versus
PRUDENTIAL ASSUARANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. wrongful termination claims and conspiracy. (Para 1 , 2 , 8) |
| 2. plaintiff's obligations and allegations. (Para 3 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 25 , 26) |
| 3. claim for wrongful termination and conspiracy. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. burden of proof and credibility of witnesses. (Para 5 , 24 , 60 , 67) |
| 5. evidence of actions leading to termination. (Para 12 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. termination process and compliance with agreements. (Para 27 , 40 , 41 , 72 , 73 , 82) |
| 7. allegations of misconduct against the plaintiff. (Para 30 , 31) |
[1] This was a claim by the plaintiff against the 1st defendant (D1) for wrongful termination of the plaintiff's Agent's Agreement dated 17 August 1999 ("Agent's Agreement") and the Agency Manager's Agreement dated 1 January 2004 ("Agency Manager's Agreement") with D1. The plaintiff's claim against the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th defendants (D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, D8 and D9 respectively) was based on conspiracy to cause injury to him by unlawful means namely by fabricating evidence against him causing D1 to terminate the plaintiff's Agent's and Agency Manager's Agreements with D1. In his Statement of Claim dated 19 November 2008 ("SOC"), the plaintiff claimed the afo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
