HIGH COURT MALAYA MUAR
PREMIUM PARK DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
RIGHT BASE TRADING SDN BHD (ENCL 47) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Enclosure 47)
Introduction
[1] This is an application to call additional witnesses pursuant to O 34 r 2(2)(e) and (i) Rules of 2012. After the calling of the Plaintiff's 1st witness, the Defendant applied for the calling of additional witness vide encl 47. These witnesses are as follows:
i. Farizal bin Abdullah, licensed surveyor.
ii. Land Administrator, Batu Pahat or the relevant and authorised officer from the Land Office, Batu Pahat.
iii. Prem Shobana a/p Gana Das, Solicitor.
iv. Kee Cheng Wei.
[2] Grounds for the application are as follows:
a. For witness (i) the evidence is sought to be adduced is the pre calculation plan on Lot PT 567 and PT 568, Minyak Beku sub District, District of Batu Pahat, State of Johore.
b. For witness no (ii) is the authorised officer who deals with acquisition and registration of the land.
c. For witness no (iii) is the solicitor who handled the tenancy agreement between parties.
d. For witness no (iv) the photographer who took the photographs and he is able to tender the photographs and explain the context of the photographs.
[3] The Cause Papers are as follows:
i. The Writ of Summons (encl 1).
ii. The Statement of Clai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.