Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
BADAN PEGUAM MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI JOHOR & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of proposed requirement and concerns raised (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding the necessity and implications of the proposed requirement (Para 8 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. court's analysis on the significance of signing the 'akuan' (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. responsibilities of solicitors in document verification (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. discussion of duty of care in land registration (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. court's conclusions on the validity and necessity of the 'tatacara' (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
Background Facts
[1] The Respondents in July year 2022, proposed to introduce a new requirement (hereinafter referred to as "proposed requirement") in the guideline known as "Tatacara Pengunaan Akuan Penyerahan Dokumen Pentadbiran Tanah Johor" (hereafter referred to as "Tatacara") pertaining to the presentation of instruments of dealings and other documents for registration at the registry offices of the Respondents in the state of Johore.
[2] The applicant having sight and having perused this "proposed requirement" in the sai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
