Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA ALOR SETAR
PP – Appellant
Versus
MOHD RODZI AHMAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case background and findings of the sessions judge. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. appeal initiated by prosecution against acquittal. (Para 2) |
| 3. accused denied presence during incidents; defense relied on alibi. (Para 6) |
| 4. legal requirements for the alibi defense. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. importance of alibi evidence notice as per cpc. (Para 11) |
| 6. errors in previous judgment regarding alibi evidentiary rules. (Para 12 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. court's errors noted regarding alibi witness evidence. (Para 14) |
| 8. final verdict and sentencing. (Para 17) |
[1] This appeal emanates from the Sessions Court at Sungai Petani. It has been filed at the instance of the prosecution.
[2] After hearing the defence, the learned Sessions Judge acquitted the respondent of the following charges:
PERTUDUHAN PERTAMA
Bahawa kamu pada 24 Februari 2012 jam lebih kurang 12.00 tengahari bertempat di dalam rumah no 1005 Lorong Wahyu 2, Bandar Utama, 08000 Sungai Petani di dalam daerah Kuala Muda di dalam Negeri Kedah Darul Aman telah merogol seorang perempuan Melayu nama Nur Afifah Azree bt Abdul Mutalib kp:XXXXXX-XX-XXXX yang berumur 14 tahun 5 bulan.
Oleh yang demikian kau telah melakukan suatu kesalahan boleh dihukum d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
