SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 2858

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
MAH SAU CHEONG – Appellant
Versus
TAN ENG CHIN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Prathib ,Respondent Advocate: Ng Chek Foo,Jonald Lee

Table of Content
1. application seeks discovery for relevant documents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. plaintiff's obligations and fulfillment regarding shares. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's examination of document relevance and necessity. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. discovery deemed necessary despite cost and language barriers. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

[1] This is an application by the Defendant under O 24 r 7(1) of the Rules of 2012 (" ROC 2012") dated 21 September 2018 (Encl 36) seeking Discovery of the documents described in the List of Documents marked as "Annexure A" against the Plaintiff.

[2] The List of Documents in "Annexure A" are as follows:

(a) Approval Letter for the Operation issued by the Tianjin Authority, China, to Xianda (Tianjin) Seawater Resources Developments Co Ltd, which are in the possession of the Plaintiff, and a copy of the same documents translated in English;

(b) A copy of the Operation Agreement signed by the Plaintiff on behalf of Xianda (Tianjin) Seawater Resources Developments Co Ltd and by the Tianjin Authority, China on November 2016, and a copy of the same document translated in English; and

(c) All letters, correspondence and emails with and/or from Tianjin Authorit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top