HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TARIQUE AZAM – Appellant
Versus
HAMDAN MOHAMAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of case facts regarding the loan agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. criteria and considerations under order 14 for summary judgment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
[1] This is an appeal by the Plaintiff against the decision of the Sessions Court Judge dismissing his application for summary judgment against the Defendant. I allowed the appeal. These are the full reasons for my decision.
Salient Background Facts
[2] The Plaintiff was attached to Ranhill Berhad and its subsidiaries. The Defendant was a shareholder of all the companies to which the Plaintiff was attached and they have known each other for some time.
[3] The Plaintiff extended a loan to the Defendant in the sum of RM500,000.00 on 24 August 2008. The Plaintiff alleged that because he extended the loan to the Defendant using his wife's overdraft facility, the Defendant had agreed to pay him interest on the loan at the rate of 7.28% on daily rest which is the interest rate that has to be paid to the bank in respect of the overdraft facility.
[4] According to the Plaintiff, the Defendant has repaid him a sum of RM150,000.00 leaving a principal sum of RM350,000.00 unpaid and interest as at 30 N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.