SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 1452

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TUNE GROUP SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PADDA GURTAJ SINGH & ANOTHER CASE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Logan Sabapathy,Vivian Oh ,Respondent Advocate: Tang Qi Wen

JUDGMENT

Liza Chan Sow Keng JC:

Introduction

[1] Originating Summons WA-24NCC(ARB)-17-03/2022 ("OS 17") was filed by the Plaintiffs (collectively "the Respondents") against the Defendant ("Gurtaj") to set aside a Final Award dated 8 March 2022 ("the Final Award") and the Correction to Final Award dated 24 March 2022 (collectively "the Award") pursuant to s 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 (" AA ").

[2] Gurtaj as Plaintiff in OS No: WA-24NCC(ARB)-21-03/2022 ("OS 21") applied to recognise and enforce the Award.

[3] Both OS 17 and OS 21 were heard together as the Award is either recognised and not set aside, or not recognised and is to be set aside.

[4] After having read the cause papers, considered the submissions and heard oral arguments, I dismissed OS 17 and allowed OS 21. This judgment contains the reasons for the decisions delivered on 4 August 2022.

Background Facts

[5] Gurtaj and the Respondents together with others are shareholders in a company known as Tune Talk Sdn Bhd ("the company"). The shareholders and the company are parties to a Shareholders Agreement dated 23 December 2008 ("SHA"). The SHA contained an arbitration agreement in cl 16 that reads:

"16.1 If any controversy, cla


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top