SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2131

HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
N VASANTHA RAJAN NAGARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
YEOH SOON PENG (NO 2) – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ronald Lee Chun Lung ,Respondent Advocate: Tan Kah Hoo,Loh Li Lian

Table of Content
1. introduction to recusal application (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. background of the judicial process and history of case management. (Para 8 , 9)
3. background of the suit and trial judgment entry (Para 10)

[1] This is a judge recusal application in relation to an application to set aside a trial judgment.

[2] The Applicant is an individual and the First Defendant in the Suit.

[3] The Respondent is also an individual and the Plaintiff in the Suit.

[4] By a notice of application dated 5 October 2017 (encl 73) ("Application"), the Applicant basically prayed that I recuse myself from hearing the Application and all other applications filed under the Suit. In addition, the Applicant prayed all proceedings under the Suit be transferred to be heard by another judge.

[5] The affidavits that were filed for purposes of the Application are as follows:

(i) Applicant's affidavit in support of Yeoh Soon Peng affirmed on 5 October 2017;

(ii) Respondent's affidavit in reply of Vasantharajan a/l N AR Nagarajan affirmed on 13 October 2017;

(iii) Applicant's affidavit in reply of Yeoh Soon Peng affirmed on 5 November 2017;

(iv) Respondent's affidavit in reply of Vasantharajan a/l N AR Nagarajan af

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top